Safety
Hello online journal, it’s been awhile. I don’t have any gaming related topics (that whole having-a-full-time-job with all the interesting bits covered by NDA thing), but thought I may process some thoughts by typing’em out. I’m considering this an explosion of thoughts I tend to share on my Mastadon account, a deviation from past journal entries, for sure.
Abstractly I’ve been observing groups of people attack other groups of people for a very long time. Whether it’s ‘left’ vs. ‘right’, religion vs. religion, concept-of-religion vs. atheism, or even preference vs. preference (folks in or even adjacent to gaming communities about a decade+ ago have a high likelihood of being exposed to ‘PC master race’ vs. ‘Console’ arguments, and the very fact one of those sides willingly presents themselves in a blatant supremacist manner is… notable). Throughout my life I’ve felt pressures to ‘pick a side’, sometimes I felt there was an obvious ethical choice and would lean there, other times I’d be confused as I didn’t feel either ‘side’ was ‘correct’ in a given conflict (perversely, in these instances the pressure to pick a side can intensify from both sides, successfully alienating me from both). More importantly, and this is now setting the stage of why I’m writing in the first place: sometimes I would pick a side because to do otherwise would make me feel unsafe.
Generally the safe ‘side’ can be the popular ‘side’. I’m going to be persistent with these quotes, as a side-note, because I feel confident that in many of these group dynamics there’s a highly likely outcome of a ‘side’ being represented by a minority of the group, and in those scenarios I’ve witnessed many times that minority representing the opposite of their own group’s majority interests.
Anyway, going with what’s popular is a pretty solid default. It provides maximum safety! Fear harassment by an unpopular ‘side’? That’s okay, plenty of allies because you picked the bigger ‘side’! Having concerns that maybe some unwanted harms may be coming out of a larger ‘side’? Oh gosh golly, something so popular couldn’t be ‘bad’, so no need to worry there. Minimization and gaslighting work wonders to absolve ethical concerns (so I’ve personally witnessed over the last 4 years).
Safety is paramount. There are folks who have had their jobs threatened based on their opinion on genocide. Here’s some reference links:
“When Posting About the Israel-Hamas War Costs You Your Job “We’re going to see a lot of fallout in the coming weeks,” says one employment lawyer.”
“The Cost Of Speaking Up: Many Lose Jobs For Supporting Palestinians
Several people across professions, such as lawyers and activists, say they have lost jobs for supporting the Palestinians in the ongoing Israel-Hamas War.”
even sports-bros aren’t safe: “Sports reporter in Philadelphia loses job over pro-Palestinian comments”
I found and skimmed those articles while writing this online journal entry, I googled “job loss over opinion on gaza”, they were in the top results (this is all very ad-hoc, I’m not a fan of writing so just kinda diving in while I had an idea to motivate me). Notably: with that search and generally over social media I have not witnessed a single punishment for supporting the ‘side’ that has all the power in the situation. Given the overwhelming evidence of punishment for simply having a friggin opinion I can suspect that safety plays heavily when someone is asked for their own opinion on the subject.
Oh, by the way, my opinion on that subject probably needs a primer from John Oliver. I signed a Canadian govt petition to throw my support behind an effort to advocate for less immediate human suffering, sounded pretty reasonable to me. So while my stance is clear (with some required reading, the situation ain’t the false binary generally presented), I can understand when folks end up regurgitating some of the revolting propaganda out of the leaders of either ‘side’ (not to mention propaganda from sources that find value and/or advantage in specific outcomes or simply having conflicts persist), and to be clear, I don’t believe either ‘side’ has leaders that support their own groups majority interest. The true ‘side’ to take that I see is those of the folks trying to live their damn lives without having bombs dropped on them, having their communities violently invaded, or worrying where they’ll acquire basic needs. I’d wager heavily there isn’t a single ‘leader’ of either formal ‘side’ forced into those or similar positions.
Interesting to see where my fingers go when I start typing, I don’t believe I’ll receive any repercussions for sharing my own opinion on that topic. At least, until I have another chat with my father, then… well, when I think about past conversations what rings through my head is his voice saying “you’re ruining your life believing in this Covid shit” and given his reference points were standard alt-right propaganda outlets, welp, I suspect my opinion would illicit a strong reaction from him. This does tie it in with my personal thoughts on the subject of safety: early on the pandemic, unbeknownst to me, I ended up picking an unpopular ‘side’, a decision to continue to retain transmission safety measures (like wearing masks in public) until Covid stops broadly transmitting in local communities. Earlier this year I contracted Covid, despite our precautions, and I isolated for 13 days (testing positive on rapid tests consistently until day 12, two negative tests was the target I set to ending isolation). I feel secure in the knowledge that transmission of that particular thread ended in our household.
It’s an unpopular choice we will continue to choose alongside doctor recommendations that we prevent high-risk family members from contracting Covid as much as possible. We have a primary adult concern as well as a child with autism. We have felt the social ‘punishment’ mechanic of our choice being made, including a severe punishment I’m itching to bemoan about to elicit any level of support but since it involves an actual court of law I’m going to leave it at that.
Here’s a thing I don’t think bullies understand (whether that bully is a multi-national corporation, ideologically driven extremist with political clout, or a neighbor who aggressively disagrees with the way you dress, there’s a large spectrum I’ve observed of that archetype), it is indeed a successful strategy to threaten someone’s safety to elicit a reaction. Perhaps early data shows these strategies as purely beneficial to the bullying entity, thus encouraging further aggressive application. It’s possible due to power structures for the bully to be seemingly immune to all consequences for their actions, political theatres worldwide have plenty of examples of these. These things I think bullies generally do understand, but eventually, when all avenues of safety are cut off and that last small space of safety is threatened… welp, doing harm gets real hard to deny when folks being harmed start pushing back. I suspect the most prolific world-wide bullies have gotten as far as they’re getting by not pushing too hard, by not eliciting enough push-back from the harms being done. Yet, I’m witnessing (across scaling from the world-stage to very personal events) a lack of understanding of that nuance allowing for sustained bullying, pushing well past any plausible explanation for the harms being done.
Reality has a way of asserting itself. Baseless claims with a foundation of magical thinking will only get a bully so far (if your presumed name is ‘George Santos’ it can get you quite far!), but eventually that foundation will shatter. We don’t live in a world of Yin/Yang counterparts, we have super villain’s but we don’t have super heroes (that wouldn’t be profitable). The villain’s will rise and fall, causing harm and destruction as they cycle through, but they will fall, they rely on unsustainable strategies. The rest of us, those looking to discover themselves, their passions, or who have found passions through that discovery they’d love to pursue: we either get lucky and get to continue our journeys, or need to hit a pause (or a restart) out of a forced threat to our last bastion of safety.
At least, that’s what I’m observing. I’m also observing powerful action pushing back against bullying of all kinds, I can only hope those of us who have been on the receiving end of abhorrent safety-threatening behavior can find allies in one another.















